Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(6)2022 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2225068

ABSTRACT

The preservation of fertility in cancer patients is a crucial aspect of modern reproductive medicine. Amenorrhea and infertility often occur after cancer therapy, worsening the quality of life. Cryopreservation of oocytes in young cancer patients is a therapeutic option for preserving fertility. A prospective study was conducted on 508 cancer patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation to preserve fertility between 1996 and 2021 including the COVID-19 pandemic period. Patients underwent ovarian stimulation, followed by egg retrieval, and oocytes were cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Sixty-four thawing/warming cycles were performed. Survival, fertilization, pregnancy, and birth rate over the thawing/warming cycles were obtained. The data were compared with those from a group of 1042 nononcological patients who cryopreserved supernumerary oocytes. An average of 8.8 ± 6.9 oocytes were retrieved per cycle, and 6.1 ± 4.2 oocytes were cryopreserved. With their own stored oocytes, 44 patients returned to attempt pregnancy. From a total of 194 thawed/warmed oocytes, 157 survived (80%). In total, 100 embryos were transferred in 57 transfer/cycles, and 18 pregnancies were achieved. The pregnancy rate per transfer and pregnancy rate per patient were 31% and 41%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between oncological patients and nononcological patients. A total of 15 babies were born from oncological patients. Children born showed normal growth and development. One minor malformation was detected.

2.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 7559, 2022 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2185827

ABSTRACT

High-dimensional omics datasets provide valuable resources to determine the causal role of molecular traits in mediating the path from genotype to phenotype. Making use of molecular quantitative trait loci (QTL) and genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we propose a multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) framework to quantify the proportion of the impact of the DNA methylome (DNAm) on complex traits that is propagated through the assayed transcriptome. Evaluating 50 complex traits, we find that on average at least 28.3% (95% CI: [26.9%-29.8%]) of DNAm-to-trait effects are mediated through (typically multiple) transcripts in the cis-region. Several regulatory mechanisms are hypothesized, including methylation of the promoter probe cg10385390 (chr1:8'022'505) increasing the risk for inflammatory bowel disease by reducing PARK7 expression. The proposed integrative framework can be extended to other omics layers to identify causal molecular chains, providing a powerful tool to map and interpret GWAS signals.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Multifactorial Inheritance , DNA Methylation/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study
3.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 38(3): 681-688, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1023340

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The main purpose and research question of the study are to compare the efficacy of high-security closed versus open devices for human oocytes' vitrification. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted. A total of 737 patients attending the Infertility and IVF Unit at S.Orsola University Hospital (Italy) between October 2015 and April 2020 were randomly assigned to two groups. A total of 368 patients were assigned to group 1 (High-Security Vitrification™ - HSV) and 369 to group 2 (Cryotop® open system). Oocyte survival, fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed on survival rate (70.3% vs. 73.3%), fertilization rate (70.8% vs. 74.9%), cleavage rate (90.6% vs. 90.3%), pregnancy/transfer ratio (32.0% vs. 31.8%), implantation rate (19.7% vs. 19.9%), nor miscarriage rates (22.1% vs. 21.5%) between the two groups. Women's mean age in group 1 (36.18 ± 3.92) and group 2 (35.88 ± 3.88) was not significantly different (P = .297). A total of 4029 oocytes were vitrified (1980 and 2049 in groups 1 and 2 respectively). A total of 2564 were warmed (1469 and 1095 in groups 1 and 2 respectively). A total of 1386 morphologically eligible oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (792 and 594 respectively, P = .304). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the replacement of the open vitrification system by a closed one has no impact on in vitro and in vivo survival, development, pregnancy and implantation rate. Furthermore, to ensure safety, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic, the use of the closed device eliminates the potential samples' contamination during vitrification and storage.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Oocytes/physiology , Oocytes/virology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Adult , Cryopreservation/methods , Cryopreservation/standards , Embryo Implantation/physiology , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Fertilization in Vitro/standards , Humans , Italy , Oocyte Donation/methods , Oocyte Donation/standards , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL